It's hype mostly
React has become something of a motto in the corporate world of top managers. I've been working in numerous organizations with senior management who determined that all front-ends will utilize React for no other reason than they think it's popular. Whenever the non-technical senior management decides on development, you know that it will come out of nothing positive. Although reaction may be quite popular, you can't believe that it is only because of its popularity that it is the appropriate thing to utilize.
Why are these decisions being taken by the top management? Well, they think it's simple to hire React engineers as React is popular. Although that's true, it doesn't indicate that it's harder to employ developers with other capabilities.
Response works best if you work alone
One of the reasons people love to react to a personal project is that you can do whatever you want. This is a nice library, which allows you to construct anything you want. It probably works very well for you if you're an experienced development developer and has a personal project, and you hack out and use React.
But this liberty is at a price. I remark often that if you've been working on one thing, you've been working on one. This simply implies that everyone may do things differently and organize their reaction project. Such disparities may be rather severe and it takes a long to get up to speed when it's time to recruit team members into the project, especially for seasoned engineers. On the other hand, each developer will work on a distinct set of standards. You attempt and build a standard for your project, which everyone follows HOPEFULLY, but I saw that too frequently.
The second expense is the absence of protection. I think the line between protections and the treatment of developers as fools is really good. You want developers to perform their work and also to support them whenever you can. You want developers. The concept of reaction is essential: do what you want. This provides you full flexibility but almost no security. You can make very awful mistakes early and you can't notice them until they are too late. Now you're stuck with a lot of codebases to refactor. What do you do often when it happens? You jerry-rig it up to operate well and never touch it again.
Fat and eat your breakfast RAM
A lot of people think React is unique as it is rendering using virtual DOMs. What you may not understand is that React and the virtual DOM consist entirely of 2 distinct ideas. You may want to know that Vue also uses a virtual DOM together with a handful of lesser modules. Many people commend this rapid breakthrough technique to the Virtual DOM. The virtual DOM, however, seems to be nothing other than a memory hog.
If you don't know how the virtual DOM works, let me provide you some information. In essence, a replica of the DOM tree is maintained in the memory of the customer via the virtual DOM. A new virtual DOM tree is constructed and differentiated from the old tree when a change takes place. Then React applies those modifications to the browser so that the user is aware of these changes.
You could assume "Oh, but there's a lot of React apps on a mobile phone that works great." It is worth remembering that anything doesn't mean that it works well just because it does. Does this truly mean that we want your PC, tablet, or phone to have enough RAM to execute such operations? I also want to emphasize that this does not prohibit you from creating a web application that truly runs smoothly, but it does imply that you must do much more effort and be much more careful if it really runs well.
Complexity is essential
You can realize that standards are crucial to guarantee that you do not despise your life if you have ever worked on a huge project that is quite complex. The more complicated an application is, the more difficult it is to work on. You may work well and have something that functions reasonably well from the beginning if you apply and adhere to standards. You will have a horrible experience if you divert and begin to do everything you want.
I indicated in a previous section that the reaction type follows the model "do what you want." I also noted that the lack of standards and protections in React sometimes means developers have the actual ability to muck up your application royally when you bring developers into your project. The bigger your team, the more difficult the task will be. All this adds to your app's complexity. The more sophisticated your application is, the more complicated it becomes, and eventually, it becomes a cloak to be used or used. It's awful for your users and devs alike.
Sold separately for appliances
React is a library, I stated, but what does it imply to us? Essentially, that implies that React will offer you a few small features and leave you there. JQuery is also a library for comparison. However, certain important characteristics that distinguish Reaction from libraries like JQuery make it harder to use.
Nothing but a react app can actually be used. It's a JQuery library, you can use it anywhere, in a react application or in an angular app. The corner is a full framework thus you can't use it other than an angular application. It can be reasonable. But React attempts to strike this strange act of balancing the library against the framework. It is a library on one level since it comes with the basic version and then you have to add whatever you want. On the other side, you really can't do much more like React if you decide to use it, as it is a framework.
The main difficulty with this paradigm is that there are extremely important elements missing from the Reaction. I'm not going to talk about them all, but I remember how to handle form. Have you ever tried to apply to React to a great extent? This is my advice: don't. In reaction, it is a complete headache to create, validate, and manage forms. You are in for a hard time if you opt to manage that yourself. The only other alternative is that you will have a 3rd party form handling library installed, and hope that your application does not disrupt version upgrades.
This is a particular example of a major problem. In other words, React does not provide you all you need, but requires you here and there to tackle portions and parts, like the form. In comparison, a structure like Angular is equipped with all this material. You do not have to download, for example, frameworks or libraries for third-party manipulation or checking using Angular.
People upgrades and upgrades
Updates to the version occur to all of us. We are on version 1.0.0 one second and all of a sudden version 2.0.0 is suddenly gone and it is bright, fresh. React does not make changes to its versions very simple, though. Let's just suppose that in React version, say 16, you created a huge project. Your project works and you're pleased with it, but then React version 16.8 hits, and new stuff like React hooks are fancy. I'm not going to dive into React hooks, but you have better react hooks since you're going to redo your complete application.
For react updates this seems to be a regular theme. Whenever they add big, new features, they do it in order to get our code to operate correctly, either in significant part or throughout the entire code base. I believe this has been a regular critique of the library's upkeep by Facebook and something that I believe just stresses the lives of the engineers.
I think React has a part in the front-end development world, but I think it is overused. I suppose its misuse is a consequence of its continual over-hypothesis. Due to the hypnotization and excessive usage reaction, our tasks at the end of the day become considerably tougher when we create huge complicated apps with several coworkers. If you utilize React for big projects and deal with so many people, they get out of hand quickly.
You're likely to wind up rewriting big sections of your code, or just rewriting the code base completely if you wish to do substantial version updates. This would be great for a little app, but if corporations compel developers to go and react, the stability of the app and the stress levels of its developers will become an issue.